If Sean Spicer knew anything about espionage, he would understand GCHQ represents a crucial bond of trust between America and Britain

Spicer: GCHQ may have helped Obama spy on Trump Spicer: GCHQ may have helped Obama spy on Trump

For an intelligence agency that likes to hug the shadows, GCHQ’s rejection of claims that it bugged Donald Trump’s campaign headquarters during last year’s presidential contest was an unusually public statement. But it is an iron law of the deeply entrenched cooperation between the US and British intelligence communities that they do not use the formidable resources at their disposal to spy on each other, nor to conduct operations on each other’s sovereign domains. To do so would irreparably damage the bond of trust that is vital to sharing highly-sensitive information.

The mere suggestion that British intelligence officers were asked by their American counterparts to spy on the then Mr Trump risks compromising a vital pillar of the transatlantic alliance, namely that neither side involves itself in the domestic political affairs of the other.

Sean Spicer's infamous accusations Sean Spicer's infamous accusations

At the start of this unsavoury affair, GCHQ did...


Subscribe now for full access or register to continue reading

Subscribe now for full access or register to continue

Register / free

No Payment details required

  • One Premium article per week
  • Newsletters and daily briefings
  • Comment on articles

Premium /£1 per week for 13 weeks

then only £2 per week, cancel anytime

  • Unlimited Premium articles
  • Exclusive Subscriber Events
  • Enjoy Telegraph Rewards
  • Comment on articles
  • Newsletters and daily briefings
  • Complimentary digital access to The Washington Post
  • Find out more
Premium Promo
Enjoy a free £50 gift card* for one of your favourite brands when you take out an annual Premium subscription
*Gift cards will be sent out by email within 21 days of the subscription start date
Please review our commenting policy